![]() ![]() Still, that's just one flaw in the cinematography. Perhaps the visual effects were unconvincing because they didn't fit into the cinematography, which is so vivid and distinctive. However, there are major points - particularly during the battle sequences - where the visual effects are offputting and actually take you out of the film. Most of the visual effects are rock solid. Of course, that's not the only faulty element in the film. The performances are otherwise excellent, - as we'll discuss later - but there are offputting moments in the acting. I also had a problem with how the performances faulted on occasion. The film suffers from some lack of development, some abrupt scene changes and inconsistent narrative usage. This is a genuinely touching, beautiful work of art, but but its flaws remain quite notable. Show Less Show Moreĥ years ago, Clint Eastwood was 76 years old and he was still making awesome movies. Overall, I think there are many good elements to Flags of Our Fathers, and I learned something about WWII, but I don't think the film accomplishes all it set out to do. Thus, I think, the film ends up reproducing the stereotypes it attempts to complicate. What is even more to the point is that Eastwood includes several scenes of intense battle sequences that display these men in the roles of traditional heroes. Even For Whom the Bell Tolls offers a similar thesis. ![]() What bothers me is that this definition of heroism isn't new, and where the film seeks to problematize heroism, it inevitably retraces ground already covered by other films. ![]() They claim that the true heroes were those who didn't survive and that they were just doing their jobs, fighting not for the country but for the man next to them. The film's thesis is that the American public thought these men were symbols of American excellence - a reason to be proud of their country - but the men were too tortured by what they saw and did to find the label fitting. On the other hand, the film attempts to problematize the concept of heroism in war. And Clint Eastwood's direction is superb, able to film battle sequences with a realism similar to Saving Private Ryan and to linger on disturbing images just long enough. On the one hand, the concentration on using these soldiers' fame for the war effort is a unique and insightful way of telling this story. As "Flags of Our Fathers" shows how the photograph became the very beginning of celebrity worship, the film questions our need to create and celebrate heroes, sometimes at a cost.The men who raised the flag over Mount Suribachi become part of the War Department's propaganda machine and are labeled heroes, much to their chagrin. Two-time Academy Award-winning director Clint Eastwood focuses equally on the war and home, crosscutting between the viciousness of the battle and the manufactured propaganda campaign and careful manipulation of the image that followed - issues that remain prevalent today. "Flags of Our Fathers" is a human drama of friendship and love, sacrifice and manipulation, set against the violent conflict of the battle of Iwo Jima. For two of the surviving flag-raisers, life became a series of compromises and disappointments for the third, happiness came only by shutting off his war experiences and rarely speaking of them ever again. ![]() and then, just as quickly as it had arrived, the glory faded. Uncomfortable with their new celebrity, the flag-raisers considered the real heroes to be the men who died on Iwo Jima still, the American public held them up as the best America had to offer, the supermen who conquered the Japanese. and made into props in the government's Seventh War Bond Tour. The photograph made heroes of the men in the picture as the three surviving flag-raisers were returned to the U.S. Lasting more than a month, the fight was a bloody, drawn-out conflict that might have turned the American public against the war entirely, had it not been for the photo, which was taken and published five days into the battle. The image served as a counterpoint for one of the most vicious battles of the war: the fight to take Iwo Jima, a desolate island of black sand barely eight square miles that would prove a tipping point in the Pacific campaign. "Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima," a picture taken by Associated Press photographer Joe Rosenthal on Februdepicts five Marines and one Navy Corpsman raising the U.S. The winner of the Pulitzer Prize for photography and one of the most-reproduced images in the history of photography, the picture has inspired postage stamps, posters, the covers of countless magazines and newspapers, and even the Marine Corps War Memorial in Arlington, Virginia. It is the most memorable photograph of World War II, among the greatest pictures ever taken. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |